Speaking at separate public events, the leaders defended the housing initiative as a development program with the potential to create employment, improve access to decent housing, and stimulate economic growth.
They argued that the project should be evaluated based on its intended benefits rather than political considerations.
The leaders also took issue with Sifuna's recent remarks criticizing the program, saying his views did not necessarily reflect the position of all members within the party.
They maintained that constructive engagement with government development initiatives should not be interpreted as abandoning the party's principles.
The differing opinions have highlighted ongoing debate within ODM over its relationship with the Kenya Kwanza administration and how the party should approach national development projects.
While some members have advocated cooperation on initiatives they consider beneficial to the public, others have urged the party to maintain a more critical stance on government policies.
The Affordable Housing Program remains one of the government's flagship projects and is aimed at increasing the supply of affordable homes while creating jobs in the construction sector.
Supporters say it addresses Kenya's housing deficit and promotes economic activity, while critics have raised concerns about implementation, financing, and affordability.
Political analysts note that public disagreements within major parties are common, particularly during periods of political realignment.
They argue that such debates reflect differing perspectives on policy rather than necessarily indicating a split within the party.
As political activity intensifies ahead of the 2027 general election, ODM leaders are expected to continue deliberating on the party's direction and its engagement with the government.
The housing debate is likely to remain one of several issues shaping internal discussions and broader national political discourse.
Tags
Kenya